BZ Journals

General Blog


How China ROHS Aims to Safeguard Human Health and Environment

Electronic materials suppliers have been significantly altering their goods since February 2003 to comply with the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive, which was started by the European Union (EU). Although some businesses have suffered economically as a result of having to comply with the new requirement, the primary goal of the directive is to decrease pollution and safeguard both human health and the environment through Enviropass ROHS compliance testing.

The RoHS directive forbids the use of 6 hazardous materials in the parts of the majority of electronic devices. These substances are polybrominated biphenyl or PBB, polybrominated diphenylether or PBDE, chromium hexavalent, cadmium, mercury, and lead.

Since the implementation of the EU rule on July 1st, 2006, electronics producers have become extremely accustomed to the term “RoHS.” China’s environmental regulations, referred to as China RoHS, were established in March 2007. Although China’s standards are comparable to those set in place by the EU, the discrepancies in the China RoHS have left North American businesses that buy and export globally in a difficult position. Here, we’ll examine some of the key distinctions between Chinese and European regulations as they relate to the packaging sector.

China released new criteria that were relatively less flexible as businesses were beginning to recover from the enormous expense of conforming to the EU standards. It involved everything from modifying assembly lines to maintaining the overall quality of the new troops. In response, several businesses have created their guidelines to address the severe repercussions they might see when conducting business abroad. To show if the items conform to other regulation checklists, China still demands precise labels.

Packaging implications

Dealing with stricter regulations in the manufacturing area is one thing, but the process becomes extremely complicated when the limits apply to packing. Take note of the final two items on the list. The efficiency of exporting products to China is significantly impacted by these factors.

The biggest drawback of China’s packaging regulations has been that they only apply to imports; items exported from the country are not subject to them. Companies may not be able to transport their electronic information products (EIP) or the packaging for those items back into China if they purchase ingredients from China. In all likelihood, purchasing from China first should make it simpler to abide by such regulations. If there are complicated regulations governing the packaging of a product, it would be great for a business to use materials that are already permitted to leave the country. It might not be the situation here. Each package entering China must be customized by businesses to suit their environmental criteria.